[147542] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Recognized Address Transfer Facilitators (was: Your Christmas
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Justin M. Streiner)
Wed Dec 14 09:17:28 2011
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 09:16:27 -0500 (EST)
From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner@cluebyfour.org>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <8C3137B6-7690-4CF5-85B2-594E450CDB7B@ukbroadband.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Leigh Porter wrote:
> I love the anti v6 stuff on some of their sites!
>
> http://www.iptrading.com/news/news.htm
Some of which seems to float between fear-mongering, possibly
mis-appropriated quotes, half-truths and information that is flat-out
wrong. I would not trust the judgment and opinions of someone who even
admitted in one of their blog posts that they had "no hands-on Service
Provider IPv6 experience."
While I can understand why IPv4 address brokers would take a decidedly
anti-IPv6 stance (deploying IPv6 cuts into their potential business), that
doesn't make it any less underhanded.
jms
