[147536] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: EFF call for signatures from Internet engineers against censorship
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Wed Dec 14 05:13:48 2011
In-Reply-To: <20111214072119.81F79800037@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 15:42:51 +0530
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
To: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I would strongly suggest that operators work with their legal
departments to endorse this paper by Crocker and others.
If other ISP organizations (such as say MAAWG) come out with
something, other operators could sign on to that as well.
The EFF petition has way too much propaganda and far less content than
would be entirely productive in a policy discussion.
--srs
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> wrot=
e:
>
> =C2=A0Security and Other Technical Concerns Raised by the
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0DNS Filtering Requirements in the PROTECT IP Bill
> =C2=A0Authors:
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0Steve Crocker, Shinkuro, Inc.
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0David Dagon, Georgia Tech
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0Dan Kaminsky, DKH
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0Danny McPherson, Verisign, Inc.
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0Paul Vixie, Internet Systems Consortium
--=20
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists@gmail.com)
