[147447] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Sad IPv4 story?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joel jaeggli)
Sun Dec 11 00:43:16 2011
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 21:42:04 -0800
From: Joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
To: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
In-Reply-To: <20196.3069.632519.601259@world.std.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 12/10/11 17:48 , Barry Shein wrote:
>
>>> I just had a personal email from a brand new ISP in the Asia-Pacific
>>> area desperately looking for enough IPv4 to be able to run their
>>> business the way they would like?
>
> This sniping elicited by the above seems inappropriate and
> unprofessional, the request/anecdote seemed reasonable and could
> elicit solutions such as partnerships, etc.
engineering solutions work with the constraints at hand.
The maximum ipv4 delegation size to be issued in apnic is a /22. one has
to assume that when it's gone it's gone.
given that constraint, I know how I'd build it.
