[147362] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Wed Dec 7 18:14:43 2011
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EDFE865.2040304@packetdam.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 15:10:33 -0800
To: Vlad Galu <galu@packetdam.com>
Cc: Nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Dec 7, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Vlad Galu wrote:
> Randy Carpenter wrote:
>> Does anyone have any suggestions on setting up BGP peering between =
Juniper (SRX) and Cisco?
>>=20
>> I successfully have cisco-cisco and juniper-juniper without problems.
>>=20
>> When I am trying to peer to one of my upstreams (who has cisco) with =
my Juniper SRX, They are seeing the link-local address as the next-hop, =
but are unable to get an ND entry for it, and thus cannot forward =
traffic to me.
>>=20
>=20
> Any reasons against exchanging v6 prefixes over a v4 session?
Multiple single points of failure.
Complexity of the configuration
More difficult to troubleshoot
Unnecessary cross-protocol dependencies.
Just to name the ones that come to mind instantly.
Any reason for it?
Owen
