[147355] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Carpenter)
Wed Dec 7 17:31:27 2011
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 17:30:24 -0500 (EST)
From: Randy Carpenter <rcarpen@network1.net>
To: Vlad Galu <galu@packetdam.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EDFE865.2040304@packetdam.com>
Cc: Nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
BGP is working fine, it is when they are trying to forward the packets back to me. They are seeing the Link-Local as the next-hop, which, for some reason, they cannot get to.
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President - IT Services
| Red Hat Certified Engineer
| First Network Group, Inc.
| (800)578-6381, Opt. 1
----
----- Original Message -----
> Randy Carpenter wrote:
> > Does anyone have any suggestions on setting up BGP peering between
> > Juniper (SRX) and Cisco?
> >
> > I successfully have cisco-cisco and juniper-juniper without
> > problems.
> >
> > When I am trying to peer to one of my upstreams (who has cisco)
> > with my Juniper SRX, They are seeing the link-local address as the
> > next-hop, but are unable to get an ND entry for it, and thus
> > cannot forward traffic to me.
> >
>
> Any reasons against exchanging v6 prefixes over a v4 session?
>
>
