[147018] in North American Network Operators' Group

home	help	back	first	fref	pref	prev	next	nref	lref	last	post

Re: IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leo Bicknell)
Wed Nov 30 14:45:29 2011

Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:44:33 -0800
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAAAwwbVfzOJmQzm06GrNRsicGgtocGx+LHFy=8JW19d-5syXnw@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org


--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In a message written on Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 01:41:49PM -0600, Jimmy Hess w=
rote:
> What's the overwhelming benefit of forcing in a  /126  on your P-t-P
> inter-router links if it has risks and complicates matters so much?

Making Owen happy. :)

--=20
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/

--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)
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=ruyj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X--

home	help	back	first	fref	pref	prev	next	nref	lref	last	post