[146883] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joel jaeggli)
Thu Nov 24 15:10:06 2011
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:09:09 -0800
From: Joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
To: Nathan Eisenberg <nathan@atlasnetworks.us>
In-Reply-To: <8C26A4FDAE599041A13EB499117D3C286B5FCF0C@ex-mb-1.corp.atlasnetworks.us>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 11/21/11 14:18 , Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
>> Look at the number that are refusing to make generous prefix
>> allocations
>> to residential end users and limiting them to /56, /60, or even worse,
>> /64.
>
> Owen,
>
> What does Joe Sixpack do at home with a /48 that he cannot do with a /56 or a /60?
prefix delegation to a downstream device via dhcp-pd
> Nathan
>
>
>
