[146790] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ray Soucy)
Tue Nov 22 11:52:41 2011
In-Reply-To: <5367.1321979808@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:51:51 -0500
From: Ray Soucy <rps@maine.edu>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:36 AM, =A0<Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
> A number of providers seem to be doing just fine with that business model=
over> on the IPv4 side of the fence. =A0And since they're usually a near-m=
onopoly in> their service area, angry customers aren't likely to actually v=
ote with their> wallets. =A0Why is there any expectation that it will be an=
y different in the> IPv6 world?
This.
My options for home are Time Warner Cable 15M down, 1M up; or
Fairpoint DSL, 3M down, 128K up.
So my option is really only TWC.
And I live 3 miles off the University of Maine campus. Other parts of
the state don't have the luxury of more than one option, if any.
You can't vote with your wallet if you're stuck with a monopoly.
--=20
Ray Soucy
Epic Communications Specialist
Phone: +1 (207) 561-3526
Networkmaine, a Unit of the University of Maine System
http://www.networkmaine.net/
