[146785] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Arturo Servin)
Tue Nov 22 11:17:33 2011
From: Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D12DB50-DDB6-4D2F-84E0-85019649A932@antelope.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:16:02 -0200
To: Joel Maslak <jmaslak@antelope.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
<snip>
On 22 Nov 2011, at 13:38, Joel Maslak wrote:
> 1) Not having IPv6 at all. I expect to get it on my DSL in about 10 =
years or so when the equipment my line on is old enough to be replaced =
under a 15 or 20 year replacement cycle.
>=20
> 2) Bandwidth caps probably affect people a lot more than changing IPs. =
I don't have one on my landline, but I expect to get it when the DSL =
aggregation devices are replaced (I suspect I don't have it now because =
the equipment doesn't do it well).
<snip>
Add to your list:
1.5) Instead of getting IPv6, getting private IPv4 and CGN service.
-as=
