[146736] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel Roesen)
Mon Nov 21 15:48:50 2011
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:47:45 +0100
From: Daniel Roesen <dr@cluenet.de>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <77E49D81-4651-40ED-8565-ED8498E56652@delong.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:27:55PM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Unfortunately, there are some ISPs that believe this is the right thing to do.
> Some go so far as to claim that scrambling customer prefixes is a mechanism
> to help insure customer privacy.
s/ISPs/governments, privacy people and influential media outlets/
There is significant political pressure (at least over here) to
continue that IPv4 habit for IPv6 as well.
Best regards,
Daniel
--
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
