[146287] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: where was my white knight....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Tue Nov 8 16:26:50 2011
In-Reply-To: <4EB9796C.9080009@foobar.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 16:25:54 -0500
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Cc: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com, nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
> On 08/11/2011 18:14, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
>> =A0the answer seems to be NO, it would not have helped and would have ac=
tually
>> contributed to network instability with large numbers of validation requ=
ests
>> sent to the sidr/ca nodes...
>
> i'm curious about sidr cold bootup, specifically when you are attempting =
to
> validate prefixes from an rpki CA or cache to which you do not necessaril=
y
> have network connectivity because your igp is not yet fully up. =A0The
> phrases "layering violation" and "chicken and egg" come to mind.
'lazy validation' - prefer to get at least somewhat converged, then validat=
e.
>
