[14628] in North American Network Operators' Group
Open Standards vs IOPS etc [was Re: BGP community based IP filtering]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Layton)
Fri Jan 16 06:43:39 1998
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 06:07:27 -0500 (EST)
From: Chris Layton <cll@mecca.servint.com>
To: "Dorian R. Kim" <dorian@blackrose.org>
cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <19980115185908.01617@blackrose.org>
On Thu, 15 Jan 1998, Dorian R. Kim wrote:
> But isn't what you described implementation details? I'm not sure if I
> see a standard to track in this... Perhaps a better venue to track
> something like this is an IEPG/RIPE/IOPS/etc.
Since you suggest IOPS as a body to track this issue, what do people think
about IOPS as a pseudo-standards group. This also came up at the December
IETF when Curtis suggested that draft-berkowitz-multirqmt document would
not be necessary since IOPS had a draft on the same subject. The IDR WG
seemed very sceptical of having a small closed body fill that role. How do
people see IOPS meshing with NANOG and the operational side of IETF?
thanks,
-chris
