[146265] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: where was my white knight....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dobbins, Roland)
Tue Nov 8 13:23:44 2011
From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins@arbor.net>
To: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 18:22:25 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20111108181459.GA13752@vacation.karoshi.com.>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Nov 9, 2011, at 1:14 AM, <bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com> wrote:
> that was/is kindof orthoginal to the question... would the sidr plan for =
routing security have been a help in this event?=20
SIDR is intended to provide route-origination validation - it isn't intende=
d to be nor can it possibly be a remedy for vendor-specific implementation =
problems.
Validation storm-control is something which must be accounted for in SIDR/D=
ANE architecture, implementation, and deployment. But at the end of the da=
y, vendors are still responsible for their own code.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
The basis of optimism is sheer terror.
-- Oscar Wilde
