[146179] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: IPv6 beta support for Android phones
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leigh Porter)
Mon Nov 7 04:07:56 2011
From: Leigh Porter <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com>
To: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>, Tom Hill <tom@ninjabadger.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 09:08:13 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGTTBnJhAdpcxGW0VWaym-Lcw9eHot4Mw=xNKULyEDUyvg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>=20
> LTE does not have the dual attachment problem since there is the
> concept of having v4 and v6 in one attachment, but it does not change
> the fact that there are not enough IPv4 addresses to go around,
> especially from a strategic planning perspective (let's design this
> once for 5 to 10+ year life ...)
>=20
Most networks seem to dish out address space behind a LSN box these days.
I have three dongle things from three networks in the UK, none of them giv=
e me a public address.
--
Leigh Porter
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email=20
______________________________________________________________________
