[146177] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Performance Issues - PTR Records

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Nov 7 02:36:17 2011

To: Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 07 Nov 2011 01:09:19 CST."
 <201111070709.pA779JpT049171@mail.r-bonomi.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 02:34:17 -0500
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

--==_Exmh_1320651257_7081P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 01:09:19 CST, Robert Bonomi said:

> You're missing some 'obvious' considerations.  Consider a spam complaint
> sent with 'full headers' included.  The rDNS _at_the_time_of_the_crime_
> is present in the complaint.

And if the rDNS isn't provided, any sane MTA will have included the IP address
and timestamp involved, which shouldn't take you all *that* much longer to
track down to one of your users.


--==_Exmh_1320651257_7081P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

iD8DBQFOt4n5cC3lWbTT17ARAirqAJ47TQLVb35g8TNH2E0Zmnq6h4Xa6wCgialZ
9cGPevzsp3cWNu61YokJTYM=
=BOod
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_1320651257_7081P--



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post