[146077] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP conf
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Gauvin)
Tue Nov 1 21:13:27 2011
X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: MGauvin@dryden.ca
From: Mark Gauvin <MGauvin@dryden.ca>
To: Edward avanti <edward.avanti@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 20:11:55 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAJxJZcmF3Vga=OjmXXyqG6QYC1aCrv29BY1GYSJnYPg_qcUjAA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Why would you want to advertise full verizon routes out to the ix? You =20
shoud only be advertising your own network via ix
Sent from my iPhone
On 2011-11-01, at 7:59 PM, "Edward avanti" <edward.avanti@gmail.com> =20
wrote:
> Halo,
> First, I accept this might not really right list for request, have =20
> use nsp
> cisco list but only first post to was succeed, sent several other =20
> for past
> 4 day and none appear (verified by list archive) so please excuse =20
> request.
>
> I am in need of a cisco config for BGP setup, we have a require to =20
> include
> IX peering at new location as well as our Verizon link, we like to =20
> take
> full bgp from Verizon and send to IX what they send us, I spend days
> reading google, and so many conflict web site example, so many =20
> example seem
> insecure no prefix list so on. end result to date is only sore eyes, =20
> would
> someone who do same (not need be Verizon) be kind to send us off list
> working running config (yes without your password heh) or at least =20
> how to
> apply to BGP router including access/prefix list and interfaces so =20
> we have
> an idea on what do, if you take two full BGP feed from two transit
> carrierin load share and IX, that good, because that our stage three =20
> plan,
> but I can work without two transit.
>
> I am not ignorant with cisco 7201, but am total newby to BGP.
>
> Best Thanks
> Edwardo
