[145911] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leigh Porter)
Wed Oct 26 09:54:31 2011
From: Leigh Porter <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com>
To: Tim <timphp@progressivemarketingnetwork.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:54:58 +0000
In-Reply-To: <020101cc92f0$b7abaeb0$27030c10$@com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 25 Oct 2011, at 09:34, "Tim" <timphp@progressivemarketingnetwork.com> w=
rote:
> This sadly is very common. It is getting more common by the day it seems=
but
> this practice has started almost a decade ago.
>=20
> An easy work around is to use a custom port as they seem to just block p=
ort
> 25 as a bad port but leave just about everything else open including 252=
5
> which seems to be a common secondary smtp port for hosting companies.
I use port 80 which has not failed me so far ;-)
--
Leigh
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email=20
______________________________________________________________________
