[145877] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Pilkington)
Tue Oct 25 14:54:51 2011
From: Christopher Pilkington <cjp@0x1.net>
In-Reply-To: <CADE4tYVeKmiXLaC9Byz=xQYANTj7MTbhEOW6sFOLLWx=uo35Eg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:53:58 -0400
To: Brandon Galbraith <brandon.galbraith@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG mailing list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Oct 25, 2011, at 2:50 PM, Brandon Galbraith wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Keegan Holley =
<keegan.holley@sungard.com>wrote:
>=20
>> Depends on the provider. Many just do not want to manage hundreds of
>>=20
> Conversely, some don't want to be paid for bare colocation (at bare
> colocation prices) and have to then support 1000+ rules (yes, 1000+) =
with
This is a large colo provider on the Upper West Side of Manhattan, so I =
(naively) expected more of them. It looks like this will be their final =
nail though.
-cjp
