|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:11:47 +0200 From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org> To: "steve pirk [egrep]" <steve@pirk.com> In-Reply-To: <CAK4no07G3hTKA5u+bGiKrL2AW94L-tf8o7ac2tygu+GvLKqiog@mail.gmail.com> Cc: nanog@nanog.org Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org [hmmm this subject is not really ops now is it...] On 2011-10-23 19:43 , steve pirk [egrep] wrote: > Just about everything on Google pages is https these days, even search if > you enable it. (or just use https://encrypted.google.com which is available for quite some time already) > If anybody on this thread uses gmail com a you really ought to take a look > at google plus. Compare the way user privacy is the primary objective, > versus the share everything by default of facebook. Since when is encrypting a transport (in this case using TLS/SSL) 'user privacy' ? The only thing it is protecting is intermediate networks sniffing or even modifying the traffic and more importantly for the company who gets all your private information: their revenue stream when they sell that data. And really, giving all your private emails to a company that explicitly reads them (even if it is 'automated') to advertise to you and then mentioning 'user privacy' is just ridiculous ;) Greets, Jeroen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |