[145715] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The Cidr Report
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Aftab Siddiqui)
Sun Oct 16 10:14:11 2011
In-Reply-To: <m2vcrp2g1r.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 19:12:33 +0500
From: Aftab Siddiqui <aftab.siddiqui@gmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>> I seriously don't understand that why an RIR can't send atleast a
>> notice to those announcing bogus prefixes. A letter in RED mailed to
>> the business address would help.
>
> RIRs claimed in the past that they have nothing to do with routing. of
> course, rpki-based origin validation changes this. but i suspect that
> they may still want to keep as distant as possible.
>
well IMHO, that's "stealing of resource." Yes if they have nothing to do
with routing than atleast they should do somethin to safe guard what they
are providing to thr members.
So, any chance of putting a banner of top polluters in next APRICOT. :)
--
Regards,
Aftab A. Siddiqui
