[145712] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [routing-wg] BGP Update Report
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William F. Maton Sotomayor)
Sun Oct 16 10:00:02 2011
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 09:58:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: "William F. Maton Sotomayor" <wmaton@ottix.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CABO8Q6TDDSNY_haEUgX+MFm48+ScAEF8eB1n5tZajuiSKQi--A@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Keegan Holley wrote:
> +1
>
> good to get a view from multiple sources even if they are automated. Should
> be easy enough to filter for those that do not want them.
Plus it's helped me in the past catch a very massive (well, OK, it was a
less than a hundred unaggregated routes run off into the Internet) leak,
which forced me to learn about prefix-lists and such. So for those that
care enough about their own networks, it can be catalyst to learning
something new.
>
> 2011/10/15 William F. Maton Sotomayor <wmaton@ottix.net>
>
>> On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Lynda wrote:
>>
>> On 10/15/2011 4:26 AM, Geoff Huston wrote:
>>>
>>>> While I am at it, does anyone read this report, or is this weekly report
>>>> also just part of the spam load on this list?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I read both of them, and also the Weekly Routing Report. I will regret the
>>> loss, and consider all three to be far more valuable than 90% of the traffic
>>> on the list.
>>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> The reports are also useful to do a double-check on changes I've made from
>> the perspective of others (even if they are automated tools).
>>
>> wfms
>>
>>
>>
>
wfms
