[145704] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James McMurry)
Sun Oct 16 01:46:59 2011
In-Reply-To: <CA+TcGd-A7+eep_Sejv3qcY-kVAZb=85FBJgLDa3DxN4_jvBDJg@mail.gmail.com>
From: James McMurry <jim@miltonsecurity.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 22:45:19 -0700
To: "nanog@nanog.org list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Ditto, and I do find it informative.
Jim
On Oct 15, 2011, at 10:35 PM, Kyle Creyts <kyle.creyts@gmail.com> wrote:
> I may not read it for the purpose of aggregation, but it is useful data to
> me for other purposes.
>
> As long as there is one person talking and at least one person listening, a
> thread is in order, and it isn't spam.
> On Oct 15, 2011 3:25 PM, "Geoff Huston" <gih@apnic.net> wrote:
>
>> From what I learned at the latest NANOG it's very clear that nobody reads
>> this any more.
>>
>> Is there any good reason to persist in spamming the nanog list with this
>> report?
>>
>>
>> thanks,
>> Geoff
>>
>>
>>
>>
