[145691] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Sat Oct 15 20:45:08 2011
In-Reply-To: <jibxcim8sbvqauugmj4vbq9e.1318724270892@email.android.com>
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 06:13:11 +0530
To: "Joelja@bogus.com" <joelja@bogus.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
those who read it and follow routing best practicez will continue to do thos=
e, those who havent yet given a shit wont get a sudden dose of exlax after s=
eeing their asn in it.
--srs (iPad)
On 16-Oct-2011, at 5:47, "Joelja@bogus.com" <joelja@bogus.com> wrote:
> I read it every week. It's a finger on the pulse of a system on which I a=
m totally dependent...
>=20
> Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> wrote:
>=20
>> Does anyone give a s**t about this any more?
>>=20
>> =46rom what I learned at the latest NANOG it's very clear that nobody rea=
ds this any more.
>>=20
>> Is there any good reason to persist in spamming the nanog list with this r=
eport?
>>=20
>>=20
>> thanks,
>> Geoff
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
