[145681] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Please change Mailman back to NOT force the rewrite for Reply-to
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Sat Oct 15 17:22:52 2011
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <20111015211758.GI3054@macbook.bluepipe.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 17:21:16 -0400
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Oct 15, 2011, at 5:17 PM, Phil Regnauld wrote:
> John Peach (john-nanog) writes:
>>> Normally I'd have just made this point privately, and perhaps only =
on=20
>>> Futures, but since it seems to be a recent change, I'm doing the =
public=20
>>> service of pointing it out, while asking that it be adjusted back.
>>=20
>> I don't see that; I have to specifically choose to reply to the list.
>> Maybe someone, like me, sets their own reply-to to the list.
>=20
> =46rom the headers.
>=20
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
> Precedence: list
> Reply-To: nanog@nanog.org
> List-Id: North American Network Operators Group =
<nanog.nanog.org>
>=20
> Mutt asks me, but other mailers might not.
Yes, he said he set reply-to himself. Look at your own post, it has no =
such header.
--=20
TTFN,
patrick
