[145571] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [outages] News item: Blackberry services down worldwide,
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike Gatti)
Wed Oct 12 12:54:35 2011
From: Mike Gatti <ekim.ittag@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D181DDABABE57E4DB72FEE00331478643F4A92@EALPO1.ukbroadband.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:53:28 -0700
To: Leigh Porter <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I have and totally get the point ...
--
Michael Gatti
cell.949.735.5612
ekim.ittag@gmail.com
(UTC-8)
On Oct 12, 2011, at 9:12 AM, Leigh Porter wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: -Hammer- [mailto:bhmccie@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 12 October 2011 17:10
>> To: nanog@nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: [outages] News item: Blackberry services down worldwide,
>> Egypt affected (not N.A.)
>>
>> I have been witness to N+1 HUMAN failures but never a N+1 hardware
>> failure or system/design failure that warranted questioning the need
>> for
>> N+2. Usually your N+1 failure is (as already referenced) pasting in a
>> bad config that gets replicated or something like that. Not saying the
>> hardware is perfect. It's just that I haven't personally seen a full
>> blown failure like that without human help.
>
> You have not seen VIP2-40s and CEF in action ;-)
>
> --
> Leigh Porter
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
