[145523] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Tue Oct 11 01:17:45 2011
In-Reply-To: <CABO8Q6RNp-VFSu1S=Cd9ZwtCgM7-sh_W50OWA=Xtrx8wU_1DBA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:17:00 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Keegan Holley <keegan.holley@sungard.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Keegan Holley
<keegan.holley@sungard.com> wrote:
> The definition of clean is also subjective. =A0There are many who would r=
un
> the IGP only for loopbacks and /30's and force everything into BGP even a=
t
> small scale. =A0BGP makes it easier to control the routing relationships
> between companies and pretty much removes the need for redistribution.
> There are trade-offs though, such as load-balancing.
just loadbalance toward the next-hop, no?
