[145482] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: meeting network

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Mon Oct 10 14:28:12 2011

From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <baf9d246-6c70-439c-a232-36801a25a620@zimbra.network1.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:23:29 -0700
To: Randy Carpenter <rcarpen@network1.net>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

+1


On Oct 10, 2011, at 10:29 AM, Randy Carpenter wrote:

>=20
> I have been at other conference that have triple or more participants, =
and it has never been anything close to the issues we are having at this =
hotel. Slightly slower performance is expected. Completely not working =
is not.
>=20
> -Randy
>=20
> ----- Original Message -----
>> In my historical knowledge of this: there are only so many venues
>> that can have 500-650 people and fit.
>>=20
>> Jared Mauch
>>=20
>> On Oct 10, 2011, at 1:12 PM, "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk@iname.com> wrote:
>>=20
>>> Then the RFP for the meeting needs to be more specific with some
>>> basic SLAs
>>> that result in a smaller bill if not met.
>>>=20
>>> Frank
>>>=20
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@psg.com]
>>> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 9:44 AM
>>> To: Randy Carpenter
>>> Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
>>> Subject: Re: meeting network
>>>=20
>>>> I would think that the contract with the hotel for the conference
>>>> would include the specific requirements for the network. Is that
>>>> not
>>>> the case?
>>>=20
>>> underlying problems
>>>=20
>>> o no hotel believe that we'll actually be significantly high use.
>>>   they simply can not conceive of it.  ietf, apricot, ... have
>>>   seen this time and time again
>>>=20
>>> o the hotel does not manage the network, so you have two comms
>>> hops
>>>   to anyone who can do anything.  and anyway, they are not going
>>>   to
>>>   provision more bandwidth
>>>=20
>>> but the problems of which i spoke were the meeting network.  which
>>> we
>>> do supposedly control.
>>>=20
>>> randy
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>=20
>>=20



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post