[145473] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: meeting network
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Frank Bulk)
Mon Oct 10 13:14:52 2011
From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk@iname.com>
To: "'Randy Bush'" <randy@psg.com>,
"Randy Carpenter" <rcarpen@network1.net>
In-Reply-To: <m28vossy83.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:12:27 -0500
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: frnkblk@iname.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Then the RFP for the meeting needs to be more specific with some basic SLAs
that result in a smaller bill if not met.
Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@psg.com]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 9:44 AM
To: Randy Carpenter
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: Re: meeting network
> I would think that the contract with the hotel for the conference
> would include the specific requirements for the network. Is that not
> the case?
underlying problems
o no hotel believe that we'll actually be significantly high use.
they simply can not conceive of it. ietf, apricot, ... have
seen this time and time again
o the hotel does not manage the network, so you have two comms hops
to anyone who can do anything. and anyway, they are not going to
provision more bandwidth
but the problems of which i spoke were the meeting network. which we
do supposedly control.
randy
