[145470] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: DPI deployment use case
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Arturo Servin)
Mon Oct 10 12:00:56 2011
From: Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGDMrW+jEjptLapUVXyG8uvUNzyVcabYL_7HYGCaj1+4a4AF8A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:59:10 -0200
To: Claudio Lapidus <clapidus@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I imagine that those proposals are not from users =85
I would add "tyrannical" telcos cracking down on their own =
customers.
-as
On 7 Oct 2011, at 14:20, Claudio Lapidus wrote:
> Hello,
>=20
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Martin Millnert <millnert@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>=20
>> I've seen tyrannical governments use Bluecoat's to crack down on =
their
>> own population(*).
>> Was this the sort of use-case you were looking for? :)
>>=20
> Ummm, not really... :)
>=20
> Actually, we've been faced with proposals to build services based on =
traffic
> classification, like e.g. "access our own webmail and all social =
networking
> sites, but not skype and video" or the capability to do exact metering =
based
> on net traffic time or volume, as well as being able to redirect the
> customer to various captive portals using HTTP redirect directly from =
the
> DPI box, and such.
