|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
In-Reply-To: <CAJAdsDkqUR9rnZz31w9Ya7WyhMfOOCNdn7oMWOh6kObbszrN-g@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 15:31:14 -0400 From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> To: PC <paul4004@gmail.com> Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:44 PM, PC <paul4004@gmail.com> wrote: > Your use case is not beyond the possibility of full DPI, but a transparen= t > proxy box of some nature would be sufficient for most of that. =A0Usage l= imits > on the other hand is often easier done via your AAA accounting/radius > solution, including policing/shaping/cutting users off/billing for overag= es. > > Ohh, and these boxes often make pretty pictures, graphs, and reports. one wonders at the cost of these sorts of solutions relative to just link upgrades as well... for some deployments +1gbps capable boxes in redundant configs are far more expensive as compared with just upgrading 1gbps -> 10gbps ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |