[145363] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: passive bandwidth estimation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Murtaza)
Thu Oct 6 04:02:56 2011
In-Reply-To: <C0A00E33-CFB5-433D-9C0B-1CC01B02F569@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:00:37 +1100
From: Murtaza <leothelion.murtaza@gmail.com>
To: Ricardo Oliveira <rvelosoo@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Thanks a lot for referring to such valuable resources. However, the problem
is that these are active measurement tools. Anyways, I will keep on looking
and will post if I'll find a good passive measurement solution.
Regards,
Ghulam
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Ricardo Oliveira <rvelosoo@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.icir.org/models/tools.html
>
> --Ricardo
>
> On Oct 4, 2011, at 11:39 PM, Murtaza wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> > I want to do passive available bandwidth measurement. I was just
> wandering
> > what tools/techniques people are generally using these days. And is it a
> > good idea to use congestion window as parameter.
> > Ghulam
>
>
