[145107] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jimmy Hess)
Tue Sep 27 18:46:58 2011
In-Reply-To: <CAE4VuKFASMmaNnDexDfF_8YiEp8dmL6vE+4Y2Cmx3X38GqTtjA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:46:47 -0500
From: Jimmy Hess <mysidia@gmail.com>
To: "David E. Smith" <dave@mvn.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:29 PM, David E. Smith <dave@mvn.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 17:08, Jimmy Hess <mysidia@gmail.com> wrote:
>> That is, HTTPs should become assumed.
> As much as that would be wonderful from a security standpoint, IMO
> it's not realistic to expect every mom-and-pop posting a personal Web
> site to pay extra for a static/dedicated IP address from their hosting
> company (even if IPv6 were widely deployed, Web hosts probably would
Thanks to TLS SNI (server name indication), a dedicated IP address is
no longer necessarily,
RFC 3546, 3.1.
Yes, it is realistic to expect every mom-and-pop posting a personal
web site to utilize a provider that implements SNI, and the sooner
they do it.
It's also realistic to expect them to buy one of those $15 SSL certificates.
Heck.... 1 year .COM registration used to cost a lot more than that.
We're not talking about huge recurring costs here.
--
-JH
