[145086] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Sep 27 10:49:57 2011
To: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:20:25 EDT."
<4E81DBA9.7050303@gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:48:26 -0400
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1317134905_14307P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:20:25 EDT, William Allen Simpson said:
> It's not legal for an ISP to modify computer data. Especially
> digitally signed data. That's a criminal offense.
Citation?
Hint - a *big* chunk of ISPs have NAT deployed, and that's messing with packet
headers. Much as many of us would like to see NAT go away, I don't think we
want an environment where deploying NAT gets us a new roommate and best friend
named Bubba. Oh, and if you're not modifying the TTL field, you're Doing It
Wrong.
> It's not legal for a vendor to sell or give away equipment that aids
> interception and modification of data. That's a criminal offense.
Again, citiation?
Meanwhile, CALEA *requires* you to have a network that aids in at least
the interception of data. What's a poor ISP to do?
--==_Exmh_1317134905_14307P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFOgeI5cC3lWbTT17ARAkj7AJ92/zD9u1+lTw/2VSKFKwncMKh2VQCgxAb5
5EEfNHLfaBURUl7do5dxT44=
=z1DK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1317134905_14307P--
