[145074] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Allen Simpson)
Tue Sep 27 04:58:29 2011
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 04:57:34 -0400
From: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@gmail.com>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <82sjnjg0zi.fsf@mid.bfk.de>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 9/26/11 4:29 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Is this with strict NXDOMAIN rewriting, or were existing names
> redirected as well? (AFAIK, most platforms do the latter, hijacking
> bfk.de, for example.)
>
Has anybody tried bringing a criminal complaint for interference with
computer (network) data?
Certainly, hijacking google.com NS records to JOMAX.NET would be a
criminal interference. After all, that's all DNSsec signed now,
isn't it?
Arguably, substituting a false reply for NXDOMAIN would be, too.
It's time to find a champion to lead the charge. Maybe Google?
