[144903] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: wet-behind-the-ears whippersnapper seeking advice on building a
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bret Palsson)
Tue Sep 20 17:29:10 2011
From: Bret Palsson <bret@getjive.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E7904D8.4000600@wjp.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:27:29 -0600
To: Bill P <nanog@wjp.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Thank you! 112 Emails on this subject, I am sick of it.
On Sep 20, 2011, at 3:25 PM, Bill P wrote:
> This has deviated so far from a useful technical discussion, it isn't =
even amusing anymore.
>=20
> =46rom http://www.nanog.org/mailinglist/
>=20
> Our pre-posting guide for messages to the NANOG e-mail list:
>=20
> Does my email have operational/technical content?
>=20
> ANSWER: NO.
>=20
> Would I be interested in reading this email?
>=20
> ANSWER: YES, obviously (unless it wasn't me posting it.) I am also =
the guy at work who everyone avoids because I am the annoying talker who =
never shuts up. I often get confused when people just walk off in the =
middle of a "conversation" (ie: when I won't shut the hell up and/or let =
anyone else talk.)
>=20
> Would 10,000 other Internet engineers want to read this?
>=20
> NO.
>=20
> STOP.
>=20
> -bill
>=20
>=20
> ps. Those who chime in with a witty comment or yet another opinion =
just when the thread seems to be slowing down are just as guilty as the =
ones who keep it doing by writing paragraph after paragraph "refuting" =
what the others have said. (When neither side has an inkling of wanting =
to acquiesce to the other side.)
>=20
> ObGodwin: Hitler.
>=20
> Can we be done now?
>=20
