[144900] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: wet-behind-the-ears whippersnapper seeking advice on building
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Kaufman)
Tue Sep 20 17:11:48 2011
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:11:43 -0700
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at>
To: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <CDDA6EAF-5EBA-46A5-A3E4-49260FBF629A@ianai.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 9/20/11 1:05 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> However, I believe the spirit of the NRPM is clear. Two circuits in
> the same conduit would qualify, one circuit with two BGP sessions does
> not.
Totally disagree. If I have a metro ethernet circuit and can see both my
transit providers over the same circuit, that's clearly multihoming.
As is a single DS3 over which I run two T-1s to different providers. Or
two ATM or Frame Relay VCs.
Matthew Kaufman
