[144829] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: wet-behind-the-ears whippersnapper seeking advice on building
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Kaufman)
Tue Sep 20 00:04:36 2011
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 21:02:49 -0700
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at>
To: Antonio Querubin <tony@lavanauts.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1109181614070.152@antonio-querubins-imac-g5-9.local>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Reply-To: matthew@matthew.at
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 9/18/2011 7:27 PM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2011, Frank Bulk wrote:
>
>> I understand that tunneling meets the letter of the ARIN policy, but
>> I'll make the bold assumption that wasn't the spirit of the policy
>> when it was written. Maybe the policy needs to be amended to clarify
>> that.
>
> I think this is a bad idea and I suspect would slow IPv6 deployment.
> Potential latency issues aside, is there a technical (not political)
> reason for doing so?
How does making it easier to use up the last of the free pool slow IPv6
deployment?
Matthew Kaufman
