[144824] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: wet-behind-the-ears whippersnapper seeking advice on building
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Kaufman)
Mon Sep 19 23:08:46 2011
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 20:07:47 -0700
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at>
To: Jon Lewis <jlewis@lewis.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.1109192101350.25015@soloth.lewis.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Reply-To: matthew@matthew.at
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 9/19/2011 6:02 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2011, Frank Bulk wrote:
>
>> I should have made myself more clear -- the policy amendment would make
>> clear that multihoming requires only one facilities-based connection and
>> that the other connections could be fulfilled via tunnels. This may be
>> heresy for some.
>
> That's not multihoming.
>
Note that for the purpose of needing an AS number, it most certainly
is... as the result is distinct routing policy from either the
facilities-based provider or the source of the tunnel(s).
Matthew Kaufman
