[144770] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: wet-behind-the-ears whippersnapper seeking advice on building a
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jimmy Hess)
Sun Sep 18 22:56:28 2011
In-Reply-To: <005a01cc766a$f3ce3450$db6a9cf0$@iname.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 21:54:10 -0500
From: Jimmy Hess <mysidia@gmail.com>
To: frnkblk@iname.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Frank Bulk <frnkblk@iname.com> wrote:
> I understand that tunneling meets the letter of the ARIN policy, but I'll=
make the bold assumption that wasn't the spirit of the policy when it was =
written. =A0Maybe the policy needs to be amended to clarify that.
>
ARIN is not in a position to judge the technical merits of a certain
network design.
Tunneling may be ill-advised, but that's the network operator's choice.
The choice of using tunnelling does not mean that they no longer will
need IP addressing,
or that they are not multihomed anymore.
> Frank
--
-JH
