[144740] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: wet-behind-the-ears whippersnapper seeking advice on building a
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Curran)
Sat Sep 17 17:39:58 2011
From: John Curran <jcurran@arin.net>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 21:39:32 +0000
In-Reply-To: <m2bouic1ee.wl%randy@psg.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sep 17, 2011, at 5:19 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> Strange... You seem to overcome it well enough to join in the
>>> discussion on PPML, but not to actual propose changes to policy.
>> i believe you are mistaken. i am not knowingly a subscriber to ppml,
>> and am not, to the best of my knowledge, participating in any
>> discussion(s) there.
>=20
> a search of my inbound and outbound mail for the last ten days shows no
> mail to or from "ppml."
>=20
> so i can debug, could you please forward to me a message where you
> believe i am participating in ppml?
Attached; this doesn't count your commentary of ARIN policies on other=20
mailing lists, as it would be more numerous but less productive.
In any case, we've fully left the realm of operational matters and
scope of the NANOG list.=20
/John
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysa=
yer...)
> Date: February 21, 2011 9:00:50 PM EST
> To: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
> Cc: 'NANOG list' <nanog@nanog.org>, 'ARIN-PPML List' <arin-ppml@arin.net>
>=20
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-donley-nat444-impacts-01
>> That document conflates problems of NAT444 with problems of NAT44=20
>> with problems of bandwidth starvation with problems of CGN.
>=20
> it may require a delicate palate to differentiate the different flavors
> of <bleep>
>=20
> randy
>=20
