[144685] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tassos Chatzithomaoglou)
Fri Sep 16 16:49:33 2011
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 23:49:17 +0300
From: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou <achatz@forthnet.gr>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <4E73AC2E.2070303@foobar.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Strangely, both the RFC (5396) and the CIDR report appear to be written by the same
guy...Geoff.
btw, am i the only one who finds it easier to remember asdot formatted ASNs?
-
Tassos
Nick Hilliard wrote on 16/9/2011 23:06:
> On 16/09/2011 00:51, Schiller, Heather A wrote:
>> I thought AS-plain notation was the standard for 4-byte ASN's?
> Wasn't there an RFC written about this by some australian bloke? I'd say
> that whoever maintains the CIDR report these days should really take a
> couple of minutes to clue themselves in about asplain syntax.
>
> Nick
>
>
>
>
