[144407] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NAT444 or ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dobbins, Roland)
Sun Sep 11 07:34:17 2011
From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins@arbor.net>
To: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 11:33:39 +0000
In-Reply-To: <D181DDABABE57E4DB72FEE00331478643BD810@EALPO1.ukbroadband.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sep 11, 2011, at 4:02 PM, Leigh Porter wrote:
> I'd agree that, usually, distributed is better but these are not distribu=
ted networks, there is a single point (or a few large single points) of con=
tact.
The point is that these aggregations of state are quite vulnerable, and the=
refore they should be as distributed as is practicable.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
The basis of optimism is sheer terror.
-- Oscar Wilde
