[144362] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: CGN and CDN (was Re: what about the users re: NAT444 or ?)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dobbins, Roland)
Fri Sep 9 13:05:59 2011
From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins@arbor.net>
To: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 17:04:59 +0000
In-Reply-To: <201109091706.54379.a.harrowell@gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sep 9, 2011, at 11:06 PM, Alexander Harrowell wrote:
> Further, if making your hosting network IPv6 is hard, the answer is surel=
y to give the job to a CDN operator with v6 clue.
This is a good strategy for payload-type content from unitary sources which=
lends itself to caching/redistribution; however, Web applications, things =
which link to/incorporate lots of content, etc. under the control of other =
organization, and 'active content' are another story, unfortunately.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
The basis of optimism is sheer terror.
-- Oscar Wilde
