[144317] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: what about the users re: NAT444 or ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Thu Sep 8 11:55:00 2011
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:54:23 +0200
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Lyle Giese <lyle@lcrcomputer.net>
In-Reply-To: <4E68E410.7010005@lcrcomputer.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> Can we really push an IPv6 agenda for CDN's when IPv6 routing at high
> backend levels is still not complete? I certainly don't have the
> 'clout' to push that, but full routing between Cogent and HE needs to be
> fixed.
if you are worried about full v4 or v6 or v8-juice routing between
cogent and X, for many values of X, then you will never be unworried.
randy
