[144174] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (jim deleskie)
Sun Sep 4 10:20:06 2011
In-Reply-To: <m2wrdoz9w0.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 11:19:34 -0300
From: jim deleskie <deleskie@gmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
While I can think of some corner cases for this, ie you have a
satellite down link from one provider and fiber to anther. I expect
this is not the norm for most networks/customers.
-jim
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>> I have worked for more then one transit free network, and have work
>> with people from (most) of the rest, we always prefer cust over peer,
>> every time.
>
> again, more than one of the world's largest providers prefer peers. =A0an=
d
> even if they wanted to change, it would be horribly anti-pola to the
> affected customers, like white hot wires. =A0and one just does not do tha=
t
> to customers.
>
> randy
>
