[144119] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [Nanog-futures] Admission for Committee Members
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (jim deleskie)
Fri Sep 2 12:13:49 2011
In-Reply-To: <1C36870A-6958-4C32-94C6-0738F284BA51@puck.nether.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 13:13:19 -0300
From: jim deleskie <deleskie@gmail.com>
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I think a co-pay would be be reasonable. If I human manually did a
refund I'm sure the process could ne 'fixed'. It would be interesting
to know how many people, based on paste events this would impact. I
agree in that I as well suspect its a very low number.
-jim
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> Two comments here:
>
> In the past a human would review and refund speakers if they paid.
>
> A nominal co-pay may be appropriate, even if it's just $10. Students qual=
ify for lower rates last I recall as well. We are talking about a small num=
ber of people here, at most 1-2 per conference I suspect based on historica=
l chats.
>
> Jared Mauch
>
> On Sep 2, 2011, at 11:27 AM, jim deleskie <deleskie@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If a
>> members company is willing to pay anyway, then people always have the
>> option of not accepting the free entrance. =A0As for people 'hardship'
>> cases, how ever you want to define it, there is no revenue loss here
>> as they would be unlikely so spend $ to attend anyway if they had to
>> pay.
>
