[144091] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [Nanog-futures] Admission for Committee Members
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Temkin)
Thu Sep 1 20:02:14 2011
In-Reply-To: <2EA1A280-C49E-49F4-91A1-4341AE993140@puck.nether.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 20:01:38 -0400
From: David Temkin <dave@temk.in>
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On the flip side of this, many of our employers donate "our" time that they
are paying us for in order for us to serve NANOG with nary a benefit. If
you take just committee calls for the PC alone, this is 48 hours a year - a
workweek. Perhaps they should feel that this donation nets them something.
-Dave
On Sep 1, 2011 6:41 PM, "Jared Mauch" <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> I have had my registration fee refunded when I was a speaker when my
employer was happy to pay. This frustrated me when the meeting had low
registration and lost money.
>
> I'm fine with people getting it waived, but the idea of everyone showing
up for a "roll-call" so they can get in free is certainly not the case. This
is why I suggested the BoD would have the authority to waive the fee if
recommended by someone else. The reason is less important to me honestly.
>
> Then again, the bar for giving a bad talk is really low. People can just
put in that effort instead.
>
> Jared Mauch
>
> On Sep 1, 2011, at 6:12 PM, David Temkin <dave@temk.in> wrote:
>
>> Randy,
>>
>> How is that "getting paid"? Receiving services in kind?
>>
>> Don't know if you've ever done Habitat for Humanity, but you get a free
>> lunch, paid for by those who have given cash to support the cause and not
>> labor.
>>
>> To bring it closer to home - we give our presenters a free admission -
>> should we also stop that?
>>
>> -Dave
>> On Sep 1, 2011 3:27 PM, "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>>> i do not support getting paid for community service. a primrose path.
>>>
>>> randy
>>>
