[143633] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OSPF vs IS-IS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Saku Ytti)
Sat Aug 13 08:53:27 2011
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 15:52:34 +0300
From: Saku Ytti <saku@ytti.fi>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <8B0CA767-D39D-4E77-BEF1-918FC4515DB5@jsyoung.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On (2011-08-13 22:44 +1000), Jeffrey S. Young wrote:
> That's interesting and if true would represent a real change. Can you list
> the larger SPs in the US that use OSPF?
AT&T, L3?
Anyhow I fully agree with the sentiment that in eu/us markets most SP rock
ISIS. At one time when I was shopping for testing gear, one box I tested was
Anritsu, which is pretty nice box for its price range, but I couldn't use it
due to lack of ISIS emulation. Anritsu sales guy asked their engineers why they
didn't do ISIS, answer was because no one uses ISIS. But I guess their focus is
asia.
--
++ytti
