[143548] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OSPF vs IS-IS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joel Jaeggli)
Thu Aug 11 21:39:40 2011
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2ipq3a8vz.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:39:04 -0700
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>, CJ <cjinfantino@gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Aug 11, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> The only reason in my opinion to run IS-IS rather than OSPF today is
>> due to the fact that IS-IS is decoupled from IP making it less
>> vulnerable to attacks.
>
> how about simpler and more stable?
not rooted to a particular area.
supports more than one AFI at the same time
isn't dependent on ip addressing to form an adjacency
etc
> randy
>
