[143534] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OSPF vs IS-IS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Thu Aug 11 18:20:15 2011
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 07:19:44 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Stefan Fouant <sfouant@shortestpathfirst.net>
In-Reply-To: <19BE2525-CC30-4776-87D9-0E52957784D4@shortestpathfirst.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>, CJ <cjinfantino@gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> The only reason in my opinion to run IS-IS rather than OSPF today is
> due to the fact that IS-IS is decoupled from IP making it less
> vulnerable to attacks.
how about simpler and more stable?
randy
